About Wayne McKinnon
As a foot note in history, Wayne once worked as a member of the team that assembled the particle detectors used in nuclear physics to discover the first evidence of quarks.
Wayne no longer works with the building blocks of the universe; instead he works with the building blocks of organizations. Unlike the tiny quark, the results that Wayne achieves for his clients are visible and have an extended lifetime.More
- Adapting To Your Surroundings
- Career advancement
- Demolishing silos and building teams
- Heroic efforts
- Lights, Camera, ACTION!
- Moving to Work of Higher Value
- Service Improvement Hall of Fame Nominees
- Wayne McKinnon's Evolutionary Challenge™
- Waynster Garage
- Where is the value?
- Worth a Laugh
- You Can't Think With Your Tool Belt on®
Latest Blog Posts
- Recommendation Needed for Technical Change Management Tool (5)
- Ross Dutcher: Only one reply: http://search.us-cert.gov/sear ch?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query...
- Can You Guess the Added Value? (9)
- Lou: Added values: Privacy via one way glass Cooler in the summer Ventilation/fresh air assuming...
- ELtee: Well other than the $$$ for R value with the new windows and insulation plus curb appeal...
- frank dickson: The value is based on the situation. If you are trying to sell your home curb...
- Renée: Replacing Exterior Windows Renovations for Your Home will Boost Home Value if decide to...
- Joanne Pardy: I don’t know about you but when we had our windows replaced the first thing...
- Gary Murch: It can be deduced that seeing as you are realizing such substantial energy savings...
- Tom Kingsbury: Given that Wayne is married, these renovations have likely resulted in a momentary...
- Wayne McKinnon: Excellent guess Rick. It isn’t the primary value that I was seeking, but it...
- Rick Daoust: I believe R Value is another value. Depending on how old your windows were and how...
- Recommendation Needed for Technical Change Management Tool (5)
- June 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- February 2015
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
Monthly Archives: May 2012
One of the attendees from a recent presentation that I gave is looking for opinions on change management tools for her organization. (A technical tool for supporting their technical change management process).
If you would like to weigh in on products pros/cons, please use the "share your thoughts" button below.
(Please no promotional postings)
I am often brought in to organizations to help with a change initiative. Change can mean many things depending on where you sit in an organization. At senior levels, change often means organizational change, while at technical levels this often is interpreted as controlling or preventing change.
Change management should be looked at as a way to enable changes that have been deemed necessary when looked at strategically.
My complaint with how many managers view change is that it is a one time tactical implementation of something, be it realigning staff with new positions or installing some new piece of technology.
Change in my opinion should be viewed holistically rather than each component in isolation. Strategically the business wants to move in a certain direction, and tactically many things have to align to make that happen. Change management at a business level may include modifying behaviors, and at a technical level modifying the technology to support that.
I have written and spoke extensively about demolishing silos. You can see one such example in one of my blog posts from January 2010.
A silo of a different type is about to be demolished on Canada’s east coast. The scenic Peggy’s Cove lighthouse is on the chopping block through a combination of:
A) Natural selection –modern steel towers with long life bulbs are cheaper to erect and maintain than houses with lights on them, and
B) Silo mentality on behalf of Canada’s Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO).
DFO owns the lighthouse and maintains it as one of their tools in keeping ships safe on the seas, in this case off the shores of Nova Scotia. The lighthouse needs significant maintenance and there is a stronger business case to be made for demolishing it and replacing it with a steel tower. From that standpoint it makes sense.
Lighthouses are relics from the past and time marches on. In the same way that we no longer need elevator operators, or welders on an automotive assembly line, we no longer need lighthouse keepers or even lighthouse. The work just isn’t there anymore.
The welder, machinists, and many other technical people including corporate information technology (I.T.) workers are no longer in demand for their skills and have or are about to be challenged to develop new skills.
The lighthouse keepers were obsolete many years ago, and now, so are the lighthouses. So, if their old value is now gone, how would you suggest the lighthouse keeper or the lighthouse itself move to work of higher value?
(Please post your response, and then I will share my own.)
Hint: I have provided some clues in the above text. Put your best ideas forward
Five Communication Barriers That You Can Actively Be Aware of
1. One upmanship
2. Hidden assumptions
3. Making up new meanings
5. Going off course
I have only listed five. I could probably fill an entire book of these.
Stepping back, I am sure that you can discover even more on your own. The point is that as we communicate with others we need to be aware that we each have our own filters, preconceived notions and varying degrees of skill in getting our point across or seeing the point of view of others.
There is a process for this and by being aware you can improve the outcomes of your conversations the same way you improve anything. Find out where you are, plan what the conversation will accomplish, converse, and measure that you are progressing in the intended direction. Take corrective action to get back on course.
I frequently give presentations. When I do I am practicing the same steps that I would in a one-on-one conversation. The specific techniques may differ based on audience size and the degree that I need to listen and understand versus being understood, but you get the picture.
From time to time I have experienced what can be considered “an out of body experience.” I’ve spoken to other presenters who have described this sensation where, mid speech, you find yourself observing yourself as if you had stepped aside and were watching the show. It is fascinating because during these moments, you can be in two places at once. In one place you are presenting and even answering questions, and in another place you are observing and analyzing what is going on and how to improve while even developing new ideas. When I tell my wife about this she looks at me as if I am from Mars, but I assure you that it happens, and not just to me. I suppose that it could be described as thinking on a higher plane.
A precursor to this phenomenon is the feeling of “being in the zone.” Things just click, and you don’t have to think about what you are doing because your mind is three steps ahead of your conscious thought, and able to change direction in an instant.
With practice thinking about what is going on in a conversation with another person, I have experienced the same thing although less frequently. I think the substantial difference is the degree of emotion in a one-on-one conversation, where you can be “sucked in” to a conversation that is going off course, rather than resisting the temptation and instead consciously bringing things back on track.
In conversation, some people use clever phrases that they rely on such as “so what you are saying is…” or “tell me why you feel that way.” While those phrases allow them to bring things back on course, even these techniques require that you to think before speaking, or analyze while listening. It is important to be aware of where you are in the conversation and there is a big difference between simply conversing recreationally where you can be much more casual compared to a serious conversation where results need to be achieved and some sort of conscious process should be followed.
What are you doing to move to work of higher value?
© Wayne McKinnon 2012. All rights reserved.
Improving service delivery is about more than serving the customer. It is about making sure that the customer CAN be served. Too many times I see organizations sabotaging their customer service workers by providing them with a service that is impossible to deliver. While you can measure customer dissatisfaction at the door that is not where it begins.
In some places bad service is a novelty, but even in those places the product exceeds expectations.
(At Bullocks I couldn't pass up either product so I had both).
...in fact sometimes the product is so appealing that you can opt for no service at all.